So, this is exciting.
You may have already heard, judging from the number of the organizations involved, that the Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan (CFSEM) has a huge campaign on August 18th. They will match 50% of all donations made to eligible organizations through their website, until the initial stake of matching funds ($1 million) is used up. Here's the announcement from CFSEM:
"Beginning on August 18th at 10am, the Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan, through the Community Foundation Challenge - Arts & Culture, is providing up to $1 million to match general operating gifts made online at www.cfsem.org to support participating arts and cultural organizations. A match of $1 will be provided for every $2 contributed."
We're in on this, and we could use it. As matching funds are available up to $200,000 per organization, we stand to gain a maximum of $600,000 in operating funds. At the risk of sounding like NPR, let me outline what "operating funds" means to us.
It means paying me, for one thing, as well as the rest of our staff. It goes towards making sure our audiences don't freeze when they come to see our shows. It means that we can continue bringing in quality artists and technicians, the folks who make us the Network. And it means that YOU can continue to have a groovy professional theatre right here in your own backyard.
The only catch is this: you must donate on the Community Foundation's website - www.cfsem.org - on August 18th, and you must do it fast (log on at 10 am). 75 groups are vying for the money, and experts predict it will be gone within hours...so act quickly to help your favorite arts organizations get a piece of the pie.
Please keep PNT in mind when the Challenge begins. We're doing K2 next year, and that mountain won't build itself.
*********************************************************************
A few more details: Matching funds will be awarded on a "first gift, first match" basis. The matching program will end as soon as the $1 million of match funds are gone. Through the Community Foundation website, donors can choose one or more organizations to support using a simple menu to locate organizations participating in the challenge. Gifts must be made online by credit card or e-check and can range from $25 to $10,000 per contributor, per organization. Only completed gifts will be matched - no pledges.
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Friday, July 3, 2009
Picasso Script, Round 2
Now that more of you have had a chance to see A Picasso, I feel better about exploring the script with more detail.
SPOILER ALERT - If you haven't seen the show yet, this may mess with your experience. If you'd like, you can also read the first, more general post about the script.
One point during the show that always amazes me (and mind you, I run sound, so I hear it every night) is when Picasso gets Miss Fischer to talk about her former lover. In a sequence that another playwright might parse out of existence, Miss Fischer lets her views on art, artists, and sex crash together in a few words. This would be just another clever double entendre, except that Hatcher uses it to prove a point Picasso makes throughout the show. It isn't shouted, but in the world that exists between these two characters, they've arrived at a strange mutual truth.
The exchange concerns the eventual fate of Miss Fischer's unnamed former lover, told in dialogue that, all at once, conflates his artwork with his bedroom performance. Now, bear with me here.
MISS FISCHER: I have had an artist. It wasn't satisfactory.
PICASSO: In Paris?
MISS FISCHER: Berlin.
PICASSO: Not the same thing.
MISS FISCHER: He was a painter.
PICASSO: Was he good?
MISS FISCHER: No. Very avant-garde. Nothing ever looked like anything.
PICASSO: Did you pose for him?
MISS FISCHER: No.
PICASSO: If you want to make love to a woman, paint her portrait. Gets her to reveal her breasts.
MISS FISCHER: He asked, but I said we should go straight to bed; more efficient. It did not last long. Every time I'd catch him in bed with another woman, he'd give a speech...
A few lines later, Miss Fischer reveals that he was killed for signing his name "in very big letters" to a manifesto issued by a political art group. Before we look at the significance of politics here, start with the questions and answers they've just given.
When Picasso asks if the dead artist was "good," Miss Fischer doesn't stop to ask if he means as an artist or as a lover. The same answer suffices for both: "No." The fact that she doesn't pause, doesn't flinch before answering--basically, lets his question retain both meanings--suggests the true bond between them, even though she hasn't given away much about herself at this point in the play. Perhaps she doesn't care which he meant. And perhaps she knows he sees them as one.
And then...she does it again. The audience is invited to laugh at "it did not last long" before she puts it into context as the term of their relationship. The first time, the dead artist's lack of prowess was conflated with his lack of painting skill; the second time, with his lack of character. (This can also be read as a subtle jab at Picasso. Just because she agrees doesn't mean he's not a rascal.)
Later in the script, Picasso staunchly insists that political art is, by nature, bad art ("The worst art in the world is political") even if good art can lead to political conclusions ("...and when they gaze on [Guernica] for its greatness, they will remember why it was painted.") Hatcher seems to be communicating a worldview, a blanket judgement. Miss Fischer challenges Picasso on many things, but here she seems to slyly cede him the point, even to bolster it. As such, the world of the play provides no counterexample to this train of logic: Correct intention = good thought = good art = good artist = good lover. Hatcher's themes certainly go beyond all this, but as the show's dynamics rely on the interplay of art, politics, and sex, this is a telling--and entertaining--part of the whole.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Okay, this is fun. I might try to get another script post in before we close the show...which will be, if you haven't heard yet, on the 19th. Yay extended run!
SPOILER ALERT - If you haven't seen the show yet, this may mess with your experience. If you'd like, you can also read the first, more general post about the script.
One point during the show that always amazes me (and mind you, I run sound, so I hear it every night) is when Picasso gets Miss Fischer to talk about her former lover. In a sequence that another playwright might parse out of existence, Miss Fischer lets her views on art, artists, and sex crash together in a few words. This would be just another clever double entendre, except that Hatcher uses it to prove a point Picasso makes throughout the show. It isn't shouted, but in the world that exists between these two characters, they've arrived at a strange mutual truth.
The exchange concerns the eventual fate of Miss Fischer's unnamed former lover, told in dialogue that, all at once, conflates his artwork with his bedroom performance. Now, bear with me here.
MISS FISCHER: I have had an artist. It wasn't satisfactory.
PICASSO: In Paris?
MISS FISCHER: Berlin.
PICASSO: Not the same thing.
MISS FISCHER: He was a painter.
PICASSO: Was he good?
MISS FISCHER: No. Very avant-garde. Nothing ever looked like anything.
PICASSO: Did you pose for him?
MISS FISCHER: No.
PICASSO: If you want to make love to a woman, paint her portrait. Gets her to reveal her breasts.
MISS FISCHER: He asked, but I said we should go straight to bed; more efficient. It did not last long. Every time I'd catch him in bed with another woman, he'd give a speech...
A few lines later, Miss Fischer reveals that he was killed for signing his name "in very big letters" to a manifesto issued by a political art group. Before we look at the significance of politics here, start with the questions and answers they've just given.
When Picasso asks if the dead artist was "good," Miss Fischer doesn't stop to ask if he means as an artist or as a lover. The same answer suffices for both: "No." The fact that she doesn't pause, doesn't flinch before answering--basically, lets his question retain both meanings--suggests the true bond between them, even though she hasn't given away much about herself at this point in the play. Perhaps she doesn't care which he meant. And perhaps she knows he sees them as one.
And then...she does it again. The audience is invited to laugh at "it did not last long" before she puts it into context as the term of their relationship. The first time, the dead artist's lack of prowess was conflated with his lack of painting skill; the second time, with his lack of character. (This can also be read as a subtle jab at Picasso. Just because she agrees doesn't mean he's not a rascal.)
Later in the script, Picasso staunchly insists that political art is, by nature, bad art ("The worst art in the world is political") even if good art can lead to political conclusions ("...and when they gaze on [Guernica] for its greatness, they will remember why it was painted.") Hatcher seems to be communicating a worldview, a blanket judgement. Miss Fischer challenges Picasso on many things, but here she seems to slyly cede him the point, even to bolster it. As such, the world of the play provides no counterexample to this train of logic: Correct intention = good thought = good art = good artist = good lover. Hatcher's themes certainly go beyond all this, but as the show's dynamics rely on the interplay of art, politics, and sex, this is a telling--and entertaining--part of the whole.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Okay, this is fun. I might try to get another script post in before we close the show...which will be, if you haven't heard yet, on the 19th. Yay extended run!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)